Category Archives: Dominion

Dominion Energy’s Power Grab

On November 15, 2018, Food and Water Watch released a report on Dominion Energy’s Power Grab, detailing the company’s long history of entrenching itself politically to smooth the way for its pollution-for-profit agenda – at great cost to consumers and the environment. Major points from the report:

  • Dominion has spent at least $59 million since 1998 on campaign contributions, lobbying and gifts to influence Virginia legislators and officials, the U S Congress and other states across the country where it has operated.
  • Dominion has repeatedly successfully crafted — and recrafted — Virginia’s electric utility rules to benefit Dominion while driving up electric bills.
  • Dominion’s legacy of pollution continues to threaten communities.
  • Despite Dominion’s slow shedding of dirty coal-fired power plants, its carbon dioxide emissions from its current coal, gas, oil and biomass power plants have been trending upward.

Read the full report here.

Divide and Conquer?

A November 7, 2018, Richmond Times-Dispatch article by Michael Martz, which also appeared in the Daily Progress on November 8, reports that Dominion offers $5.1 million in plan to aid Buckingham community next to pipeline compressor station. Dominion is offering a $5.1 million improvement package to the African-American community that is the site of the proposed compressor station in Buckingham County. The package would include expanded emergency services and a new community center. According to Dominion, the package is “not something that is directly tied to the compressor station air permit. It’s a community need that we want to address.” But the improvement package is contingent on the successful completion of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, whose estimated construction cost has now reached $7 billion (up from the original estimate of $4.5 billion).

Some in the community welcome the package, others deride it. The Rev. Paul Wilson, pastor of the Union Hill and Union Grove Baptist churches near the proposed compressor station’s 58-acre site, says, “They’re using it as a divide-and-conquer technique.” According to the article, “Wilson said he was part of some discussions with Dominion in its attempt to engage the community, but contends the company deliberately left the church out of the discussions that led to the agreement it reached with other residents.”

People and Pipelines

People and Pipelines is a video series featuring people in the pathway of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline – including Nelson County’s Richard Averitt. Through conducted research and on-site interviews, People and Pipelines is a platform for the histories and experiences of people most impacted by the construction of this pipeline. See their Web page for more information and other videos in the series.

Virginia Has a Pipeline Problem

On November 2, 2018, the Washington Post published on its website an op-ed by former Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, a Republican and a conservative – an op-ed opposing Dominion Energy’s Atlantic Coast Pipeline project. In Virginia Has a Pipeline Problem, Cuccinelli, who was Attorney General from 2010-2014, says he is not opposed to natural gas pipelines, and is not opposed to eminent domain for “appropriate and necessary projects. But I am opposed to captive monopoly customers shouldering the cost and risk of Dominion projects that are rubber-stamped without anyone at any level asking whether the pipeline provides value to Virginians.”

He points out that every Dominion customer in Virginia will “pay hard cash for this unneeded project when the utility bill shows up, thanks to a poorly regulated monopoly scheme that Dominion and its political cronies have constructed.”

He reminds readers that “Dominion Energy Virginia testified before the Virginia State Corporation Commission in September that the company has not analyzed how much the Atlantic Coast Pipeline will cost its customers. That answer is, frankly, shocking, especially after a non-Dominion expert testified that the pipeline would raise power bills by $2.5 billion over the next 20 years. Dominion intends to charge its customers for all of its Atlantic Coast Pipeline contract costs, regardless of whether it actually uses the pipeline.”

And he says, “From my view as a former Virginia attorney general, the process that allows Dominion to do business this way is broken, and Virginia consumers will be left holding the bag.”

Read the full Cuccinelli op-ed here. It will appear in the print edition of the Washington Post on Sunday November 4, 2018.

Dominion Announces Yet Another ACP Price Rise

In a November 1, 2018, article in Yahoo Finance, Dominion’s Tom Farrell announced yet another cost increase for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline from a range of $6.0 to $6.5 billion to a range of $6.5 to $7.0 billion, excluding financing costs. “Atlantic Coast Pipeline is pursuing a phased in-service approach with its customers, whereby we maintain a late 2019 in-service for key segments of the project to meet peak winter demand in critically constrained regions served by the project. ACP will be pursuing a mid-2020 in-service date for the remaining segments of the project. Abnormal weather and/or work delays (including delays due to judicial or regulatory action) may result in cost or schedule modifications in the future.”

The original cost projection for the ACP was $4.5 billion and the original expected in-service date was the end of 2018. Numerous independent studies (here, here, and here, for example) have shown that, despite what Dominion says, there are no “critically constrained regions” needing the gas.

Tom Farrell’s Op Ed vs Reality

Thomas F. Farrell, Dominion CEO, has an op ed column in the Richmond Times-Dispatch for October 20, 2018, Powering Virginia’s future with clean, affordable, and reliable energy. As one might expect, it is filled with misleading and erroneous statements. For a reality check, read Blue Virginia’s detailed commentary on and corrections of the op ed column.  Here are three of Blue Virginia’s multiple corrections to Farrell’s piece:

  • “The Atlantic Coast Pipeline is a great example of the type of investment it takes to affordably and reliably power Virginia’s homes and businesses, while also making our energy cleaner.” (This is utter rubbish. In fact, the Atlantic Coast Pipeline is a massive, multi-billion-dollar boondoggle that is not needed, will likely end up “stranded” in a few years, and which absolutely will NOT make “our energy cleaner,” as fracked natural gas must have “methane losses…kept below 3.2 percent for natural gas power plants to have lower life cycle emissions than new coal plants over short time frames of 20 years or fewer,” and that “methane leaks offset much of the climate change benefit of natural gas.”)
  • “While the project is overwhelmingly supported by the communities where it’s being built, it has encountered opposition.” (Any serious evidence that this project is “overwhelmingly supported by the communities where it’s being built?”)
  • “The Atlantic Coast Pipeline will save consumers money on their natural gas and electricity bills” (In fact, according to Will Cleveland of the Southern Environmental Law Center,the pipeline contract that Dominion has signed on the Atlantic Coast Pipeline will actually increase customer costs by about two billion dollars”)