On January 11, 2018, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission rejected Constitution Pipeline’s petition asking FERC to find that New York state wrongly denied the project a key permit.
In April 2016, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation denied Constitution Pipeline a water quality permit, which is required for the project to progress. Constitution challenged the DEC denial and in August 2017, a U.S. Court of Appeals rejected the company’s argument that the DEC was “arbitrary and capricious” in denying a water quality permit. One of Constitution’s argument to FERC was that the NY DEC failed to give its decision within a reasonable amount of time, but FERC said New York had made its decision within a reasonable amount of time — within one year of the pipeline’s most recent appeal. Constitution Pipeline has 30 days from the January 11 FERC order to appeal and then FERC has 30 days from an appeal request to act.
Despite being repeatedly denied permits in New York, Constitution Pipeline has all its permits in Pennsylvania, and there, despite objections of property owners, trees have already been cleared in preparation for construction. Here’s a re-post of an article from September 2017 that spells out the mess early tree-cutting has caused for Pennsylvania landowners on the Constitution pipeline route. Half the sugar maple trees (550 of them!) on one family’s maple sugar farm a few miles from the NY border were cut – and then the pipeline was blocked by neighboring New York.
Read the news report from WAMC on the January 2018 decision.
Read the press release on the NY Attorney General’s filing in 2016.
Read about the August 2017 decision by the US Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.
January 18, 2018 update from Kallanish Energy: Constitution Pipeline files petition with U.S. Supreme Court. “Constitution Pipeline Co. is taking its fight with New York state to the U.S. Supreme Court, Kallanish Energy reports. The project sponsors, in a Tuesday statement, said, ‘We continue to believe that this federally-approved project has been unjustly prohibited from construction.’ The $1 billion, 121-mile natural gas pipeline is a joint project of Williams Cos., Cabot Oil and Gas, Piedmont Natural Gas and WGL Holdings. The company has petitioned the nation’s highest court to review the judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Last Aug. 18, that court denied Constitution’s challenge after the New York State’s Department of Environmental Conservation denied the company’s application for water-quality certification. A rehearing request was denied by the appeals court on Oct. 19. On Jan. 11, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission upheld the New York decision, even though FERC had approved the project.”